Application of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy DEMATEL for Evaluation of Environmental Good Governance Components


Volume 3, Issue 4, Number 2, Pages 27-44, Published Online October 20, 2015

Full-Text PDF


Dr. Laya-Olfat, Mahsa Pishdar


 Elaborating an effective solution for improving the quality of environment has gained attentions. Governments have interests in investing in environmental sustainable activities. Despite of these kinds of attempts and introduction of environmental good governance, green issues require a continuous study in the field to gain an advantage. Current study has investigated the components of environmental governance by usage of interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL. It has been distinguished that agency and Adaptiveness from elements of environmental governance can determine the changes of the whole system. Besides, there are knowledge, norm, power and scale which play roles as crosscutting themes and their footprints are specified in all the elements. The results show that knowledge and norms have the ability to change the other crosscutting themes while power is more influenced by others. Such findings can help scholars to figure out how they can make the environmental governance have better performance


Environmental good governance, Fuzzy sets, Interval type-2 Fuzzy DEMATEL


 Abdullah, L. & Najib, L. (2014). “A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.” Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 3297–3305.
Abdullah, L. & Zulkifli, N. (2015). “Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management.” Expert Systems with Applications, 42(9), 4397-4409.
Allen, W., Kilvington, M. & Horn C. (2002). “Using Participatory and Learning Based Approaches for Environmental Management to Help Achieve Constructive Behaviour Change.” Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0102/057.
Barau, A. & Al Hosani, M. (2015). “Prospects of environmental governance in Addressing sustainability challenges of seawater desalination industry in the Arabian Gulf.” Environmental science & policy, 50, 145–154.
Belbase, N. (2010). “Environmental Good Governance in the Future Constitution of Nepal. ”<>, (March 19, 2015).
Biermann,F., Betsill, M.M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H. & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). “Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project.” Eearth System Governance, < > (March 22, 2015).
Biermann, F., Betsill, M.M., Camargo Vieira, S., Gupta, J., Kanie N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., Siebenhuner, B.,Yanda, P.Z. & Zondervan, R. (2010). “Navigating the anthropocene: the Earth System Governance Project strategy paper.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 202–208.
Earth System Governance Project (2015). “About Earth System Governance Project.” < > (March 22, 2015).
Handayani, I. (2013). “Embodying Green Constitution by Applying Good Governance Principle for Maintaining Sustainable Environment.” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 11.
Janicke, M. (2006). “The “Rio Model” of Environmental Governance– A general Evaluation.” Environmental Policy Research Centre, Forschungsstelle Für Umweltpolitik Freie Universität Berlin.
Jelin, E. (2000). “Towards a global environmental citizenship?.” Citizenship Studies, 4(1), 47–63.
Li, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, Y. & Mahadevan, S. (2014). “An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management.” Applied Soft Computing, 22, 504-510.
Lin, R.J. (2011),. “Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32–39.
Mason, N.H. (2014). “Environmental governance in Sierra Leone’s mining sector: A critical analysis.” Resources Policy, 41, 152–159.
Mattor, K., Betsill, M., Huayhuaca, C., Huber-Stearns, H., Jedd, T., Sternlieb, F., Bixler, P., Luizza, M. & Cheng, A.S. (2014). “Transdisciplinary research on environmental governance: Aview from the inside.” Environmental science & policy, 42, 90– 100.
Najam, A., Papa, M. & Taiyab, N. (2006). “Global Environmental Governance: A Reform Agenda.” International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Canada.
Watts, M. (2011). “Ecologies of Rule: African Environments and the Climate of Neoliberalism, The Deepening Crisis, Governance Challenges After Neoliberalism.” New York University Press, New York and London, In: Calhoun, C., Derluguian, G. (Eds.).
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1997). “Final Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Participatory Development and Good Governance.” <www.> (March 19, 2015).
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2004). “OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.” <> (March 20, 2015).
Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., Doll, C.N.H., Balaban, O., Jiang, P., Dreyfus, M., Suwa, A., Moreno-Peñaranda, R. & Dirgahayani, P. (2013). “Green economy and governance in cities: assessing good governance in key urban economic processes.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 138-152.
Resnik, D.B. (2011). “What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important?” < > (March 22, 2015).
Sternlieb, F., Bixler, P., Huber-Stearns, H. & Huachuca, C. (2013). “A question of fit: reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems.” Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 117–125.
United Nations (2015). “Environment.” <> (March 19, 2015).
UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) (2009). “What is Good Governance?” <> (March 19, 2015).
WHO (World Health Organization) (2003). “Climate change and human health: risks and responses.” <> (March 19, 2015).
Zadeh, L. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.


No comments

Be the first one to leave a comment.

Post a Comment



Events 2016


Events 2016